Last night the right man was re-elected President. There is no question who should have been elected. Many conservatives in the HBD world supported Mitt Romney; but, really, there were no good reasons to do so, as many of these same conservatives pointed out:
In Obama’s defense, much of the employment circumstances have been beyond his control. It’s not as if George W. Bush had any great love for native-born Americans, and it’s not as if a putative President Romney will give a rat’s ass about them either. [Mangan]
Today I want to write about the ridiculous Republican assertion that we can’t raise personal income taxes on those with income greater than $250,000, because those people are small business owners who won’t be able to create any jobs if their income tax is raised by a few percentage points.
Do the people who believe this even understand the meaning of income tax? Employee payroll is a business expense, so the personal income tax rate has nothing to do with whether or not a new employee will be hired. All employee expenses are paid out of pre-tax dollars. Higher income taxes are just as likely to encourage more employment. “If the government won’t let me keep the money myself, I may as well spend it on another employee.”
My tax rate doesn’t affect hiring. If I think I can do more business, I hire more workers. The costs of finding, hiring and paying new employees are business expenses. They’re deducted upfront from our taxable income.
Why do we put small business owners on a pedestal, anyway? To hear Republicans talking about them, you’d think that each small business owner is the second coming of Jesus. Not that there’s anything wrong about being a small business owner, but neither is there anything holy about it. Not everyone can be a small business owner. If every owned their own business, who would do all the work of employees? We probably already have too many people trying to start small businesses.
Do people even know the definition of a “small business”? It’s fantastically broad. Anyone who fills out a Schedule C is considered a small business owner. That means I am a small business owner. And a “small” business can have millions of dollars of revenue and hundreds of employees but still be classified as a “small business.” That doesn’t sound very small to me.
They say that fewer than 3% of small business owners make enough money to be affected by Obama’s proposed tax increase on the rich. And why does it matter whether a lawyer making more than $250,000 year is making that money as the owner of his own law firm or as an employee of someone else? If you look in the yellow pages (if yellow pages still exist), you will see that there is no shortage of lawyers. If one less lawyer decides to hang a shingle, I assure you all that there will be no great loss to our society.
Republicans seem to think that starting businesses is something rich people do in order to pay back society. Sorry, this is not the case. People start businesses in order to become rich, become richer, or because they hate working for someone else. Starting a business is a winner-take-all endeavor. The vast majority of small businesses either fail, or never make their owners especially rich. [Half Sigma]
The Republican anti-abortion platform is toxic to key voter constituencies such as the upper middle class, Jews, and most non-evangelical women.
The Republican anti-abortion platform is a huge turnoff to those undecided voters that Republicans have to win. Anyone who was strongly anti-abortion would already be voting Republican. People who are only slightly anti-abortion don’t care if other women want to abort their own pregancies. People who are slightly pro-abortion are turned off by Republicans because they want to keep their own or their family’s options open. The anti-abortion platform reminds the smart upper middle class people that the Republicans are a bunch of stupid Jesus freaks.
Republicans need to dump their suicidal anti-abortion platform. Back when Republican Mitt Romney was pro-choice, he was able to win the gubernatorial election for the very liberal state of Massachusetts. This demonstrates that it’s abortion more than any other Republican policy that keeps a lot of people voting for Democrats. [Half Sigma]
I don’t see why gay people need to get married. I don’t see the benefits for society. On the other hand, the inevitable legalization of gay marriage (the gays will eventually win this one, they are effectively brainwashing the younger generation to be pro-gay) is not going to destroy society, which is gong to be destoryed because of dysgenic breeding and dysgenic immigration. [Half Sigma]
Not surprisingly, it’s always 1980 for the Republicans. Mansized Target notes:
Romney gave a big foreign policy speech at VMI. In it, he shows he has basically been living in a cave since 1980. Bottom line for him: America must be strong and America must lead. …
He wants to be the next Reagan, but his written-by-others foreign policy neglects to remember that Reagan was a creature of time and place: a diminished economy, much like what we face today, but also a world where American faced a sui generis and aggressive foreign policy threat in the form of the Soviet Union. Likewise, Reagan inherited a demoralized military gutted by the post-Vietnam malaise of the 1970s. Today we have a strong and capable, if small, military, that is state of the art in every way. Whereas in 1980 out-in-front leadership and universal engagement made sense, today we are in a period of forced austerity, overcommitment, and failed nation-building.
Boosting military spending in the 1980s turned out to be colossally successful. The Red Army gave up without a fight. But because there’s no more Red Army, the upside of more defense spending is small. What’s the best that can happen now?
Historically successful policies can’t help but run into diminishing returns. [Steve Sailer]
Democratic blogger Kevin Drum responds:
Really, it’s pretty amazing. Just two years ago, Republicans walloped Democrats in the midterm election, at least partly due to a tsunami of ads accusing them of taking money away from Medicare. And Republicans have been on the receiving end of Medicare attack ads too. So they know perfectly well just how sensitive this issue is and how much damage it can do. And yet, somehow they convinced themselves that Paul Ryan had some kind of magic fairy dust that would make the American public sit up and suddenly say to themselves, “He’s right! We do need to turn Medicare into a voucher!”
I dunno. The entire Republican Party seems to have fallen into some kind of Svengali-like trance, convinced that Paul Ryan, alone among men, can deliver the bracing tonic that will convince voters to do away with program benefits they’ve loved and supported for decades. The self-delusion here is inexplicable.
Okay, but what else are the Republicans allowed to put forward other than a libertarianish ideology at home and war abroad?
Then, again, if you let your enemies define which arguments you are allowed to make, is it any surprise if the permitted lines of appeal aren’t all that effective? … I know there is much knife-sharpening among Republicans to denounce Romney and/or Ryan as bad candidates who couldn’t sell a good ideology, but, I dunno. You’ve got a ticket of smart, good-looking, hard-working, competent, sane, morally decent, diversely-accomplished guys and, yet, what they’re selling isn’t being bought. Maybe the problem is less with the messengers than with the message? [Steve Sailer]
The Romney/Ryan ticket really had nothing to offer, and wouldn’t have made much progress in solving the real problems facing the country. As well, they would have enabled the Republicans they presided over to wreak untold havoc.
I actually called this result long ago; I stated after Obama’s first election that he would be re-elected in 2012. (I will also mention that I predicted Obama’s Presidency way back in 2006.) My reasoning was that the Republicans simply didn’t have a similar star candidate to put forward to defeat Obama, and that has come to pass, as predicted (Half Sigma made a similar prediction.) I will now say that Republicans should take heart: I predict that the odds are in your favor in 2016, simply because the Democrats have no act to follow Obama. I will also predict that White conservative outrage this time around will make the Tea Party look like nothing.
Sure, problems remain. We still have immigrants flowing in unchecked, and the strain that that causes for our economy. We still direct untold amounts of education dollars towards the least able students in a futile attempt to close “the gap“. We still have rampant denial of the reality of HBD. And, we will have to address all these problems. But for today, it’s a time to celebrate!
Edit, 12/23/12: Also see Peter Frost’s dispelling of the putative harms of Obama’s policies compared to that of the Republicans’ at Evo and Proud: Obama: White America’s bogeyman?