Skip to content
April 27, 2013 / JayMan

Keep calm…

420730_515914321802949_893799640_n

Someone took that advice… 😉

Advertisements

22 Comments

Leave a Comment
  1. Andrew Selvarasa (@Animelee) / Apr 28 2013 12:16 AM

    You’re pissin’ off a bunch of white nationalists in the Dark Enlightenment right now. 😉 “REGRESSION TO THE MEAAAAAAAAAN!” “GENOCIIIIIIIDE!!!”

    • JayMan / Apr 28 2013 12:27 AM

      Haha yup. Fuck ’em… 😉

    • Anonymous / May 1 2013 1:39 AM

      Keep calm and date a Desi 😉

  2. szopeno / Apr 28 2013 2:02 AM

    Fuck ’em? I thought you are hetero 🙂

    • JayMan / Apr 28 2013 11:14 AM

      Metaphorically… Funny, man, funny…

  3. szopen / Apr 29 2013 3:43 AM

    Besides, why do you think they deserve such pleasure?

    OK, enough with bad jokes for today 🙂 Sorry 🙂

  4. Anonymous / Apr 30 2013 12:28 AM

    Your tags for this are; “funny, good advice, joke posts, once you go black”

    “once you go black”……. what?

    • JayMan / Apr 30 2013 12:54 PM

      Click on the tag and you’ll see.

    • Anonymous / May 1 2013 1:44 AM

      I once went black. I RAN back. But now I’m ready to go black again. But you’re already taken, right?

    • JayMan / May 1 2013 5:10 PM

      Yes I am.

  5. Anonymous / Apr 30 2013 1:39 PM

    The White Nationalist fringe of the Manosphere has completely bastardized the science of HBD.
    And they foolishly assume that individuals armed with HBD would want to mate and marry with their “own kind”. For me, my exposure to a number of the world’s ethno-cultures has caused me to be attracted to ever wider varieties of members of the opposite sex.

    • Andrew Selvarasa (@Animelee) / Apr 30 2013 8:01 PM

      Same here. My dad is a Tamil Sri Lankan, and my mom is an Indo-Guyanese (her great-grandparents are from Northeast India). So already I am “mixed”, albeit still a brown mutt. I was always fond of girls from all over, but now that I am well-versed in their phenotypic differences, and the origins of those differences, I appreciate them even more.

    • Anonymous / May 1 2013 1:41 AM

      “My dad is a Tamil Sri Lankan, and my mom is an Indo-Guyanese (her great-grandparents are from Northeast India).”

      Keep calm and date a Desi 😉

    • JayMan / May 1 2013 5:17 PM

      The White Nationalist fringe of the Manosphere has completely bastardized the science of HBD.

      They don’t help. It’s hard to get over the impression that HBD is the religion of a bunch of angry White guys if you prove them right.

      And they foolishly assume that individuals armed with HBD would want to mate and marry with their “own kind”. For me, my exposure to a number of the world’s ethno-cultures has caused me to be attracted to ever wider varieties of members of the opposite sex.

      Indeed. Truth be told, most matings will be within race, because, by and large, people prefer “their own kind”. So that’s an unfounded fear.

      While I understand the motivation among the WN HBD’ers – if you find that the believers what you speak of are on one team, then it makes sense to align with that team – it doesn’t help to adopt a seemingly exclusionary attitude to individuals of other races. That sets up an “us vs them” when it comes to the reality of HBD. What interest do people of color have in acknowledging it them? Something to think about…

    • Anonymous / May 2 2013 1:15 AM

      It would be totally hilarious if “people of color” hi-jacked and took over the HBDsphere.

      Would have those white racists smackin’ they heads like “how the hell did this happen!”

      How about HBD adherents of all different backgrounds miscegnating (misceg mating) with each other ON PURPOSE because they WANT to get the widest range of genes into their offspring to increase their chances of ….. whatever.

      How about a black nationalist man or woman marrying a white nationalist man or woman because their only other options were “race denialist liberals” of their “own kind”!

      I dated a black nationalist once. He basically turned ME into a racist with all his rhetoric.

      Good lord our arguments got ugly and those trigger words we’re not supposed to say dropped like candy falling out of a Mexican pinata.

      Finally I just offered to help find him a black nationalist “nubian queen” since black people were so damn superior what was he doing with me?

      I read one of his black nationalist books wherein the author stated that any black man who has sex with a white woman is actually engaging in homosexuality because in his sub-conscious mind he’s not thinking of the woman but of the white slave master that raped his great great grandmother and he’s having sex with a white woman to get back at “The White Man” and hence, since his mind is only filled with thoughts of “The White Man” during sex, its a homosexual act!!!!

    • Andrew Selvarasa (@Animelee) / May 2 2013 10:36 PM

      “Keep calm and date a Desi ;)”

      Thanks to HBD, whenever I see brown girls these days, my mind runs towards the mathematics behind pedigree collapse.

      It’s funny that HBD will drive some towards members of their own race, and others towards miscegenation for genetic diversity in offspring…and to offset any heebie-jeebies when calculating the most recent common ancestor(s).

    • anon666 / May 3 2013 10:59 PM

      People do marry their “own kind”, but one’s own kind is determined primarily by consideration of social classes. HBD only indicates that each social class might have different concentrations of racial groups.

      There’s a common assumption on the HBD-sphere that a widespread acceptance of HBD by the educated classes would have conservative implications, but such assumptions underestimate the resiliency of liberalism. If educated white liberals came to accept it, they might feel a little bit less guilty about gentrification, but it would do nothing to damper their cosmopolitan internationalist tastes. They’d still feel a sense of benevolence toward the underclass, because even if underclass pathologies can be explained in part by genetics, that actually reinforces the liberal view that the underclass are victims (if not of oppression/marginalization, then of biology), and severely weakens the conservative “pull yourself up by your boot straps” view.

      I can see the educated classes eventually pushing for a humane form of “soft eugenics”, keeping in mind that although the view is currently regarded as morally outrageous, it has no inherent ideological incompatibility with liberalism. What I don’t see is them developing any special affinity for the “white race”. Their “tribal” loyalty will life first with their “own kind” — namely, other educated liberals from every country — and secondly, to the underclass, who they will pity for having no power to improve their situation. That said, they may start to recognize the necessity of finding a means to humanely cull the underclass. They’re sympathetic to stray cats and dogs too, but they believe in spaying and neutering.

      I don’t see anything wrong with this. Although I’m a more of a Hobbesian liberal than a progressive liberal (and consequently harbor no warm fuzzy feelings for the underclass), I think progressive liberalism would be less annoying if it had a greater basis in reality, although the moral status-competition dynamic of the community undermines its capacity for realism.

    • anon666 / May 3 2013 11:16 PM

      Also, re, the WNs: Europeans have been pretty successful in proliferating their DNA over the course of the ages, as it can be found in varying concentrations not just in Europe, but throughout North South America, Oceania, Siberia, Central Asia, West Asia, North Africa and South Africa. Even Mongolians have a minor amount of European ancestry and it’s not uncommon for them to have blue eyes.

      As a big fan of both blue-eyed women as well as Eurasian women, I’m hoping that more European DNA will flow into East Asia — perhaps from Russian women…

    • Anonymous / May 6 2013 4:22 PM

      Anon666 says,
      “I can see the educated classes eventually pushing for a humane form of “soft eugenics”,”

      – They already DO push for a humane soft eugenics by exclusively marrying and breeding with their ideological and class equals.

      “keeping in mind that although the view is currently regarded as morally outrageous,”

      – Not so. See above.

      “it has no inherent ideological incompatibility with liberalism”

      – Not only does it not have an inherent ideological incompatibility, it is 100% compatible.

      “What I don’t see is them developing any special affinity for the “white race”. ”

      – Absolutely not. As you yourself point out below….

      “Their “tribal” loyalty will life first with their “own kind” — namely, other educated liberals from every country”

      – Precisely.

      “and secondly, to the underclass, who they will pity for having no power to improve their situation”.

      – Guess what? They DO have the power to improve the situation of the underclass by MARRYING THEM – but they will not do this.

    • asdf / May 10 2013 10:39 PM

      anon666,

      Progressives did embrace eugenics before WWII. When you read “That Hideous Strength” the “progressive element” was strongly in favor of eugenics and hated the underclass. Rejection of eugenics only came after the Nazi’s, and only then when progressives realized that race was a way for them to advance their own status against their competitors (other whites). Progressives should be viewed as selfish opportunists first and foremost, and their “charity” as a form of bragging (oh, you can’t afford your own bubble to insulate from these dumb policies? well I can).

      HBD can never be embraced by NAMs because even smart NAMs grandchildren will inevitably revert to the mean. If everyone knew that nobody would mate with even smart NAMs because they would know that their descendants would be damned. That is one reason why Jayman is marrying a white girl, it will improve the genes of his offspring.

  6. anon666 / May 3 2013 11:01 PM

    Sorry, that post had quite a few typos and grammar mistakes, but I think it conveyed my basic message.

  7. Jai / May 5 2013 10:17 PM

    “You’re pissin’ off a bunch of white nationalists in the Dark Enlightenment right now.”

    The moment I came across the term “Dark Enlightment” as a way to refer to impolite knowledge of race-based human differences, I started cracking up. Um, isn’t there a particular race-based difference such a term suggests? Instantly, I’m imagining a smug, erudite black guy trotting out this phrase as his way of suggesting, “once you go black you never go back.”

    Any black History/English/Philosphy PhDs, the Dark Enlightenment pick-up line is the way to go when hitting on your melanin-challenged female colleagues.

    I enjoy reading the Derb a lot, but man, sloganeering is not his forte.

Comments are welcome and encouraged. Comments DO NOT require name or email. Your very first comment must be approved by me. Be civil and respectful. NO personal attacks against myself or another commenter. Also, NO sock puppetry. If you assert a claim, please be prepared to support it with evidence upon request. Thank you!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: